A blurry line between propaganda and news
Never share methadone with someone else, especially someone having a history of habit or addiction tadalafil dosage. Psychiatric unwanted effects have included anecdotal reports an incident studies of psychological disturbances and aggressive behaviorThere exists with Concerta methylphenidate cialis without prescription.
|Written by Khody Akhavi|
|Friday, 27 July 2007 03:00|
Washington - A shocking thing happens midway through Norman Solomon's documentary film "War Made Easy".
While analyzing the George W. Bush administration's lead-up to the Iraq invasion, Solomon plays a news clip of Eason Jordan, a CNN News chief executive who, in an interview with CNN, boasts of the network's cadre of professional "military experts". In fact, CNN's retired military generals turned war analysts were so good, Eason said, that they had all been vetted and approved by the US government.
"I went to the Pentagon myself several times before the war started and met with important people," he said. "We got a big thumbs up on all of [the generals]."
In a country revered for its freedom of speech and unfettered press, Eason's comments would infuriate any veteran reporter who upholds the most basic and important tenet of the journalistic profession: independence.
But the relationship between the press and government in the US during times of war is changing. In Solomon's film, it is just one example of the collusion between the government and the mainstream news media.
"War Made Easy", which is narrated by Hollywood actor and peace activist Sean Penn, begins as an anti-war film that decries the Bush administration's interventionist rationale and misinformation campaigns during the post-9/11 era. Through a montage of video clips from cable news networks, presidential statements, and historical footage from previous US military interventions, it compares the propaganda techniques of the past with the present, and draws striking parallels.
Richard Nixon's "Vietnamization" rhetoric, which expanded the Vietnam War instead of ending it, sounds very similar to President Bush's declaration that "as the Iraqis stand up, we will stand down."
The first half-hour of this 73-minute documentary spends too much time explaining to the audience much of what it probably already knows. But it redeems itself by delving into the insidious tactics used by the Bush administration in managing a war of choice, and how the mainstream media colluded with the US government to boost the war effort.
"Rarely if ever does a war just fall down from the sky. The foundation needs to be laid, and the case is built, often with deception," says Solomon during an interview in the film.
"War Made Easy" was produced and directed by Loretta Alper and Jeremy Earp for the Media Education Foundation, a non-profit that distributes educational programming "to reflect critically on the media industry and the content it produces," according to organization's website. Its board of advisors includes prominent left-wing academics such as Noam Chomsky and Cornell West.
Six years after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the US news media's tepid performance during the build-up to the war has been exposed and criticized by the very establishment that was supposed to hold political officials' "feet to the fire," as the journalistic proverb goes.
In one interview clip from the Jon Stewart comedy show, CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer shrugs and says, "We should have been more skeptical," drawing a puzzled look from Stewart.
"War Made Easy" does not dispute the idea that the press is self-correcting, is willing to investigate its own reporting lapses (as the New York Times did after the Judith Miller WMD scandal), and issue apologies and retractions. But it warns against the ostensible collusion between press and government. In Solomon's view, the US mainstream news media is cast as part and parcel of the Bush administration's war apparatus, an echo chamber that packages, builds support for, and, through the vehicle of "leaked misinformation," sells the war to the US public.
For example, in the lead-up to "Operation Iraqi Freedom," CNN chairman Walter Isaacson sent a memo to his anchors and reporters asking them to "remind viewers why they are watching the war." As video of the clean-up at Ground Zero in Lower Manhattan rolls across the screen, one can't help but thinking about Sept. 11.
Solomon also labours over the parallels between US government propaganda and how the rhetoric is now filtered into a more sophisticated media campaign, yet for all intents and purposes, fulfills the same goal. In short, it is more insidious than ever.
In one scene, he describes how a Hollywood set designer was hired to build a news set (with polished backdrop and sleek high-definition televisions) for the public relations arm of the US military during the Iraq war. Presentations by military commanders and officials resemble news broadcasts. There is no discussion of the facts, and what the government says is accepted without question.
None of these revelations are exactly new, but the historical parallels between Vietnam and the Iraq war are becoming increasingly clear as the US remains for a fifth year in Iraq. "War Made Easy" offers a timely criticism of the media, and portends an ominous future for the US news viewing public should they sit back and accept without question the pronouncements of political leaders and evening news anchors. Inter Press Service (IPS)
[Visit our Video section to watch the trailer.]